 | Daily Opinion Summaries
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals |  | | June 03, 2011 FindLaw.com Daily Opinion Summaries Newsletter |
Table of Contents LATEST SUMMARIES Media Law, Class Actions, Commercial Law, Consumer Protection Law, Entertainment Law, Civil Procedure
• Brantley v. NBC Universal, Inc.
• Vasquez de Alcantar v. Holder
Administrative Law, Immigration Law
• Guevara v. Holder
Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas Corpus, Sentencing
• Sessoms v. Runnels
Get free FindLaw Case Law Feeds - Auto Notifications From 80+ Courts! FindLaw's case summaries are copyrighted material and are not intended for republication without prior approval. You may, however, freely redistribute this e-mail in its entirety. To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com.
LATEST SUMMARIES Media Law, Class Actions, Commercial Law, Consumer Protection Law, Entertainment Law, Civil Procedure
Brantley v. NBC Universal, Inc., No. 09-56785
In a class-action for damages and an injunction to compel programmers and distributors of television programming to sell cable channels separately, judgment of the district court dismissing action is affirmed where plaintiffs failed to allege any cognizable injury to competition. Read more...
Vasquez de Alcantar v. Holder, No. 08-71427
In a petition for review of an order of the BIA, petition is denied where an approved Form I-130 Petition for Alien Relative does not confer admission status on an undocumented alien for purposes of showing seven years of continuous residence under 8 U.S.C. section 1229b(a)(2). Read more...
Administrative Law, Immigration Law
Guevara v. Holder, No. 08-72252
In a petition for review of an order of the BIA, petition is denied because the grant of employment authorization, pending the approval of adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. section 1255, does not confer admission status on an undocumented alien for purposes of calculating seven years of continuous residence under 8 U.S.C. section 1229b(a)(2). Read more... Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas Corpus, Sentencing
Sessoms v. Runnels, No. 08-17790
In a petition for habeas relief from convictions of first degree murder, robbery, and burglary, 28 U.S.C. section 2254, on the grounds of Miranda violations, judgment of the district court denying petition is affirmed where, under AEDPA deference, it cannot conclude that the decisions of the California state courts on very close Miranda questions, were contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, established Supreme Court precendent. Read more...
 Feedback
We value your comments! Please take a moment to tell us what you think by sending us an e-mail. | Subscription Information
Click here to subscribe to a FindLaw Newsletter. To unsubscribe, click here. | Advertising Information
For more information about advertising in FindLaw Newsletters, click here. | | 800 W. California Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 94086 |
| | |
You are currently subscribed to 9th-caselaw as: ideola09.petra@blogger.com .
To manage your newsletter accounts go to: http://newsletters.findlaw.com/sub/review-account.jsp
No comments:
Post a Comment