FindLaw Contracts Summaries - March 14-March 18, 2011

Weekly Opinion Summaries Contracts March 14-18, 2011 FindLaw.com Weekly Contracts Newsletter Quick Links Cases & Codes Careers LawBrain Legal Market Center Lawyer Directory Lawyer Marketing You may forward this e-mail in its entirety. Table of Contents Contracts Bodansky v. Fifth on the Park Condo Leap Systems Inc v. Moneytrax Inc Coronado Cays v. City of Coronado South Sutter v. LJ Sutter Partners Shanahan v. State Farm General Ins. Co. FindLaw's case summaries are copyrighted material and are not intended for republication without prior approval. You may, however, freely redistribute this e-mail in its entirety. To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com. SPONSOR Contracts United States Second Circuit, 03/15/2011 Bodansky v. Fifth on the Park Condo, No. 10-0720 & 10-1147 In dispute involving the scope of the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (ILSA), 15 U.S.C. sections 1701-20, order by district court dismissing complaint by plaintiffs is vacated because whether a lot is exempt under the 100-lot exemption is determined as of the time a purchaser or lessee signs a contract to purchase or lease that lot. Read more... United States Third Circuit, 03/15/2011 Leap Systems Inc v. Moneytrax Inc, No. 10-2965, 10-3107 In a commercial dispute, district court's order denying motion by petitioner to unseal portions of a judicial record containing the terms of a confidential settlement agreement is affirmed, where, on balance, the privacy interest of plaintiff outweighs public interest in disclosure. Read more... California Court of Appeal, 03/16/2011 Coronado Cays v. City of Coronado, No. D056377 In a dispute involving the scope of a special use permit, judgment that defendant is responsible for maintaining a berm that supports bulkheads located on property within the subdivision of plaintiff is affirmed because grounds for appeal are without merit. Read more... SPONSOR California Court of Appeal, 03/16/2011 South Sutter v. LJ Sutter Partners, No. C059554 In a case involving the scope of a option agreement, trial court judgment in favor of defendant is affirmed where trial court correctly held that anti-SLAPP motion was timely and arose from the exercise of constitutional rights by defendant. Read more... California Court of Appeal, 03/17/2011 Shanahan v. State Farm General Ins. Co., No. G042988 In a case for breach of contract and breach of the convenant of good faith and fair dealing arising out of the refusal by defendant to defend the plaintiff in a sexual harassment lawsuit, summary judgment in favor of the defendant is affirmed where there was no triable issue of fact regarding the causes of action of the underlying litigation such that defendant was required to defend plaintiff under the terms of an existing insurance policy. Read more... SPONSOR FindLaw includes summaries of all Supreme and Appellate Court slip opinions posted on the official Illinois Courts site. FindLaw summaries include opinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawal. Check the Illinois Courts site to determine if a specific opinion has been released before relying on that case as precedent. Feedback We value your comments! Please take a moment to tell us what you think by sending us an e-mail. Subscription Information Click here to subscribe to a FindLaw Newsletter. To unsubscribe, click here. Advertising Information For more information about advertising in FindLaw Newsletters, click here. 800 W. California Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 94086

You are currently subscribed to contractcase as: ideola09.petra@blogger.com .
To manage your newsletter accounts go to: http://newsletters.findlaw.com/sub/review-account.jsp